Germany
Country DE; state can be preserved as sub-jurisdiction.
DACH and North America are not execution jurisdictions. BestCura resolves country and, where relevant, German/Austrian state, Swiss canton, U.S. state or Canadian province/territory from authoritative facility context.
DACH is not a jurisdiction. North America is not a jurisdiction. Germany is not Austria. California is not Texas. Ontario is not Québec. BestCura separates presentation from authoritative legal and authority context so similar screens never silently imply identical execution rights.
Shared language or region must never imply shared legal authority.
Country DE; state can be preserved as sub-jurisdiction.
Country AT; no silent German policy fallback.
Country CH; canton can remain explicit context.
Country remains Germany.
A country-only model could miss the sub-jurisdiction change.
BestCura binds sub-jurisdiction separately and invalidates only authorizations that actually depend on it.
No global shutdown, but no blind reuse of a bound old authority state.
U.S. state and Canadian province or territory remain part of authoritative jurisdiction context.
State is a first-class sub-jurisdiction.
Province and territory use a neutral sub-jurisdiction model.
Language, display region or client-supplied country do not determine execution authority.
Country remains US while state changes.
A US-only authorization is too coarse.
Jurisdiction state and professional authority are resolved for Texas.
A California-bound authorization cannot silently survive the move.
No. DACH is a region. BestCura resolves DE, AT or CH and, where relevant, a sub-jurisdiction.
No. BestCura explicitly separates the United States and Canada and preserves their relevant sub-jurisdictions.